Skip to content

Foundation Cloud Grants

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

201 results found

  1. Currently the Recipient address field only supports one address line. If you have a recipient that requires two address lines, these lines run together as one. This makes the address look off when letters are generated.

    RE, while it only has 1 address box, that box is large enough and editable, so you can format the address to have 2 lines and to display correctly. We request that NPact add a 2nd address line or format it address field to behave similarly to RE.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  2. Currently, in order to see if a grant has been voted on and approved (by committee or individuals depending on ORG requirements), you have to complete the following steps:

    1. go back into the docket
    2. navigate to the approval tab
    3. go to the approval submissions tile
    4. click on the 3 dots next to the approvers name and select "approval submission details" in order to see which grants have been voted on and approved.

    This has to be done for each docket that is added to a check run before proceeding with processing. In my specific ORG we could have 5 or…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Batch  ·  Admin →
  3. can you please add another filter to the online grant request screen to be able to view the status of more that one at the same time. Need created and submitted grants to both pull up together. Thanks

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  4. Once payment added to a check run, looking at the grant, the summary only shows STATUS: Check Run Batched. Would be beneficial to have 'link' to the batch in this summary section. Otherwise, the user has to go to Batch>CheckRuns>open batch which is a slow performer and takes 1-2 minutes each time. Time gobbler if the user wants to review several/all grants in a check run for whatever reason.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  5. Request to extend the query results screen timeout to more than 1 minute in order to retrieve more than 100 records of data. Currently, the timeout on the query results screen is set to 1 minute. If your data does not finish loading within that time, the "Load All" records button does not appear and you are not able to pull more than 100 records.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    1. Would be great if toast notifications recognized the space bar or enter on the keyboard and not just the mouse click to clear.
    2. Toasts not cleared by user, continue to stack up, even after you leave that record which can be confusing when it doesn't relate to the current record open.
    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  6. Would be very helpful when a constituent has an existing RE record but is currently not approved, that the name is displayed in Orange (as it was in GE Classic). Functionality lost in FCG.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  7. Allow the option for grants to flow from FCG to FE in Pending status instead of approved status so that finance can make the last approval before payment is sent.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    In Review  ·  0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  8. Select a Characteristic Code list would be helpful if there can be an option to condense to the first alpha level and user not having to scroll down through hundreds (i.e., A01, A02, A03 to get to R)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  9. +Add Media has no field to describe attachment. Our file naming convention is driven by our retention policy and does not include the description. If I want to specify that the attachment is the 'request' or 'school change', 'stop payment',etc. and this would be a huge benefit if someone has to review and open multiple attachments to find the one, rather than being able to tell which is which.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  10. I did a lot of correspondence templates, and request you revisit the functionality of the "Import from Document". It appears correct, but it doesn't produce a clean copy (Source) and has lots of extra coding which seems to cause spacing problems (soft return vs. hard return). I cannot get a single line return; it is always 1 1/2 which is not the desired look for an address which you want stacked and not large spaces between. The work around I found is not to use the Import from Document function, but to copy and paste the Document format into the…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  11. When generated grants from a Designated Grant, it always creates a standard grant. The dropdown of Grant Types when adding a recipient consists only of Standard Grant Types.

    Can this be enhanced to allow you to pick a Scholarship Grant type?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  12. Have a method of checking to see which Grants in a Check Run have had email Correspondence sent, so far the only method of checking this is by checking each individual Grant record to see if the Email shows under Documents. If there is one grant without an email sent it is hard to figure out which grant it was in a large batch.
    For example have a column that says "Email Sent", so we can easily verify the email notification of a grant processed has been sent. Or 20 of 20 emails sent.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
  13. The current file size limit for uploads is 5 MB. Please raise this cap as some documents are larger than 5 MB that are needed for due diligence during Grant processing.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  14. Currently, there are a TON of Amount fields on a Grant record.
    Grant - Amount/Adjusted Amount
    Fund - Amount/Adjusted Amount
    Payment - Amount/Adjusted Amount
    Payment Component - Amount/Adjusted Amount

    There are times when these fields no longer align, causing discrepancies in reporting. The number of amount fields feels excessive and it is a pain to try to keep them all aligned with each other. Can this be simplified in any way?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  15. After grant and payment creation, an FCG user is able to change the funds available on the grant. They can choose to add, update, or remove the Fund from the grant. These actions do not keep Payment Fund Components aligned, however, causing data inconsistencies (A payment fund component could have a fund that is NOT present on the grant).

    I would like to see 1 of the following -
    Validation during check run processing to ensure all funds present on the grant payment exist on the grant. Do not allow check run processing if a fund is present on the…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  16. To separate/group templates by type (i.e., Deposit Notifications, Award Letters, Award Agreements, Decline Letters, Check Letter, Overdue Notices, Evaluation Reports, Others)

    We have 100+ variations of the deposit notification alone and paging forward by just 10 results at a time, means lots of clicks (time gobbler) since these are displayed alphabetically.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  17. Fund Balances often do an initial grouping of data based on Page. Currently if you create a new line item entry in the Fund Statement builder there is no option to enter Page, which can result in errors in the report.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Settings  ·  Admin →
  18. The designated grant "Parent" record lists the grant history in order of oldest first. We have been using this function in GE Classic for a very long time and some of our parent records have hundreds of grants. The arrow up/down to resort by date DOES NOT WORK. Since it only displays 8 grants per screen, the forward and backward arrows are not efficient for a user. The page forward > only moves 1 page at a time after the 5th page, you've also missed an opportunity with not having a return to 1st< or go to end> option. This…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  19. Under the Designated Grant Recipient tile, the Active box is so tiny and light, it is incredibly hard to distinguish if checked or not. Would be better with a colored check mark instead of gray.

    Same goes for the Constituent summary where any of the following boxes could be checked: Recipient, Payee, Applicant, Requires Fiscal Sponsor, etc.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5 10 11
  • Don't see your idea?