9 results found
-
Query Statement Improvements
Improve query functionality so ALL system fields are available in queries AND, allow for more advanced query statements a la RE and FE functionality so a user can build a query statement (without having to know SQL) with parenthesis, etc. so you can say ALL of these these filters and ANY of these filters, etc.
4 votes -
Query Export Alternate Options
Add new query export options such as Excel, XML, JSON, PDF etc.
Limiting the only export file option to CSV has created issues relating to the automatic CSV formatting that occurs upon export. Providing alternative options (i.e. XLSX) will provide users with workarounds to potential issues involving data deformation.
Example: Essay questions in applications become broken apart into sections when exported as a query. This is an automatic occurrence that is caused by the formatting of a CSV file. This issue cannot be circumvented, as the only option to export is CSV.
4 votes -
To extend the query results screen for more than 1 minute
Request to extend the query results screen timeout to more than 1 minute in order to retrieve more than 100 records of data. Currently, the timeout on the query results screen is set to 1 minute. If your data does not finish loading within that time, the "Load All" records button does not appear and you are not able to pull more than 100 records.
1 vote -
Ability to Schedule Reports
Recommend developing functionality so users can schedule reports to be run and emailed to a user group (a la FE NXT and forthcoming RE NXT functionality).
1 vote -
Save and Copy Queries in Cloud
I would really like to be able to save and copy queries in Cloud as we are able to in Classic. I like the ability to create similar queries, for example, for each of our organizations that have funds with us, instead of having to create each one from scratch.
4 votes -
Characteristics available as a field in Constituent-based queries
We'd really like to have characteristics available as a field for constituent-based queries. Currently I can only find them in grant-based queries. For example, we are putting a characteristic on the constituent record for recepient organizations that have requested grants by EFT instead of check (this is a work-around for the lack of ability to set payment defaults in individual constituent records in GE, or even better, have them connect to the defaults set in FE; there is another post here on UserVoice about this issue). So, we would like to be able to run a report to see which…
4 votes -
Ability to add profile fields not listed to improve queries and correspondence templates
Allow GENXT Queries under Reporting to add profile fields to gather info that is not currently available. For example, in GENXT WebApplication queries, please add the field that pulls title of the project submitted by the applicant along with the request amount. These fields might be found on a Web Application addendum from a specifically created web application, but there is not a way to add profile fields from specifically created web applications to include in a query as previously allowed in Classic. My correspondence templates need to be able to pull this type of data, but I cannot add…
3 votes -
Add Web User information to Constituent Query
Add Web User information to Constituent Query. Foundation Cloud Grant constituent records have a Web User tile with information that would be nice to get in an constituent list or query. Similarly Foundation Cloud Community Portal has list of "Manage Web Users" list, but with limited/missing fields from the constituent record
3 votes -
Query area improvements: ability search query names, see who created query in the grid, and edit queries from the individual query screen.
Add a search feature for the query screen (to search for query names). See in grid the user who created the query and what query "focus" it is. Add button to edit a query after you are already on an individual query screen (edit button currently only available when you're on the full query grid).
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?