Skip to content

Foundation Cloud Grants

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

201 results found

  1. Recommend developing functionality so users can schedule reports to be run and emailed to a user group (a la FE NXT and forthcoming RE NXT functionality).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
  2. To pull scores more easily, make app group tiles exportable. It would be great to pull the applicants' names, reviewers' names, and reviewers' scores. This would be easier than pulling a query and would not have to ask for a custom query anytime reviewers scores by fund or addendum were needed.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviews  ·  Admin →
  3. In scholarship reviews, more fields should be available for query. For instance, when I asked for the addendum names to be pulled into a reviewer score query so that I could make awards, the names were not available. Fund names and Addendum names need to be available to pull in.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reviews  ·  Admin →
  4. Please configure workflow tasks for Grants to produce a record status change like they do for Proposals and Scholarships.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  5. We'd like the option to add specific application fields to the Submitted Proposal Apps grid. We currently have "Category" as a field in our application and we'd like to be able to view this information in the grid and be able to filter all the applications by it.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    In Review  ·  0 comments  ·  Online Apps  ·  Admin →
  6. in database view you can go to all web users and be able to view on that screen what funds they are appoved to either view or be a fund advisor. in NXT there is no choice to show the fund on that page. can you please add "fund" so we can see this without having to open the fund itself each time. thanks

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Backlog  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  7. Incorporate a way to notify staff outside of the system that there are items that need addressed? Historically, our portal use by donors has been very limited, having someone constantly logging in and checking, is helpful but having an email sent to notify of the actions pending would be more productive.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  8. Implement single sign on across Foundation Cloud products so we can use Microsoft/Google/others to use FCG.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  9. In GE/NXT Cloud the Grant History is sorted newer to older, but Proposal History is sorted older to newer, and you can't sort by columns. Please make this consistent (newer to older) and allow users to sort columns.

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Backlog  ·  0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  10. Currently when submitting a docket to the committee for review, we must navigate away from the docket screen and into the queries screen to generate the correspondence to the committee. This step seems longwinded, as there is a button within the Docket screen for "new batch correspondence", which we currently use to generate grant recipient letters.

    We would request that an option under "template" within the "new batch correspondence" button, be added. We would like an option for generating the correspondence to the committee, that a docket is awaiting approval housed directly in the Docket screen under "template" within the…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  11. When new users register in the Portal, staff has the option to deny their roles and delete their web user through the PPQ. When this happens, the option to send the web user an email is not provided. We should be able to communicate to the deleted web user that we denied their role request.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  12. Allow users to create designated grants from the grant step on a proposal workflow.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    In Review  ·  0 comments  ·  Proposals  ·  Admin →
  13. Please add the Save and Copy feature to Foundation Cloud like it is in the Database view. Very necessary feature

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  14. When importing grants in FCG, don't require the email or address fields for payee or grantee. The import process appears to search and link to existing constituents, which makes importing this data redundant. This information wasn't required when importing in GC Classic.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Grants  ·  Admin →
  15. The naming of items across FCG/FCCP needs to be standardized.

    Some examples:
    Fund Advisors are labelled as "Requestors" in FCG.
    "Opportunities" in FCCP are "Proposals" in FCG.
    On Constituent records, the "Contacts" tile are actually Relationships.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Settings  ·  Admin →
  16. Submitted on behalf of customer Karen Hudson

    We used to have the ability to hide the tabs on the "Grants Pending" page of the portal. We were told in a Support Case that back in February of 2022 an update was made to FCCP which made it so all 4 tabs are now required, which means they can no longer be hidden. Our organization does not utilize the functionality of at least one of these tabs and would like to hide it to streamline the process for our users.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Proposals  ·  Admin →
  17. Percent Data Type requires users to enter a value between 0 and 1 for a percent to show correctly. i.e. if you enter 0.5 into a percent field it will display 50%. This is confusing for applicants as they are filling out applications.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Online Apps  ·  Admin →
  18. This is a new request!

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  19. There are a few odd things about adding a constituent that we would request be reviewed.

    1. When processing a new fund request, when searching for a constituent that IS located in the CRM you can select them, but any new data that was provided in the request (new address, phone numbers, email addresses) are not stored or added to the existing record in the CRM and therefor is lost unless recorded manually prior to selecting the existing record. This information should be transferred over.

    2. If a constituent is NOT present in the CRM there is a button to add them…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  20. When processing the New Fund Request, you can choose to look the advisors up in the CRM or create them as a constituent in the CRM. Obviously, the best practice is to always look the constituent up first. When you click on the Lookup link, you are required to enter the constituent’s information to look them up. This should automatically populate with the data already entered by the client in the fund request. We should not be rekeying this data.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  • Don't see your idea?